Media and politicians, Alito argued, had attempted to portray his work as devious and hazardous.
He remarked, “This representation feeds unprecedented attempts to intimidate the court.”
Check out our business page for more articles.
In a statement issued on Thursday, Justice Samuel Alito defended the Supreme Court against criticism it has received since it upheld a Texas law banning abortion after six weeks of pregnancy earlier this month.
On September 2, Alito joined the majority of justices in refusing an emergency request to halt a Texas statute widely regarded as one of the most restrictive in the country when it came up for oral argument. In a method some experts have dubbed the “shadow docket,” the Court ruled 5-4 on an emergency docket without holding a full briefing or hearing.
Alito slammed the term “shadow docket,” claiming that it paints the Supreme Court’s procedures as “sneaky and dangerous” and “sinister.”
The associate justice addressed a crowd at Notre Dame University, “The truth is that the processes we followed were neither innovative or murky.”
This image feeds extraordinary attempts to intimidate or destroy the court as an independent institution, he noted.
The 30th of September 2021 will be marked by Mark Joseph Stern
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee convened an inquiry into the use of the “shadow docket” by the Supreme Court and the Texas abortion ruling. Democrats criticized the court’s actions, while Republicans defended them.
Some detractors, such as abortion-rights advocates, Democratic leaders, and others, have blasted the judgement by the Texas Supreme Court, claiming that it violates the 1973 historic Roe v. Wade decision, which protected women the right to an abortion up to 24 weeks into their pregnancies.
The following is a continuation of the story: